.
Feedback

Thousands Urge Best Buy to Oppose Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment

After Target's recent statement in opposition to the amendment, a recent University of Minnesota Law School grad started a Change.org campaign to get Best Buy to do the same.

More than 15,000 people have joined a campaign on Change.org asking that Best Buy speak out against the that will be on the ballot this November. The amendment would change the Minnesota Constitution to state marriage is only between one man and one woman.

According to a press release, Andrew Korando, a recent University of Minnesota Law School graduate, started the campaign following Target Corporation's recent statement in opposition to the amendment.

“Opposing this amendment is not simply the right thing to do, but as a local institution, it is also in Best Buy’s best interest if it wants to recruit and retain the industry’s top talent,” Korando said in the release. “I moved to Minnesota from another state, earned a law degree, and planned on making this state my home because I love how well the state takes care of all Minnesotans. If corporations allow this discriminatory policy to pass, they’ll lose people like me.”

For every new signature on Korando’s petition, an e-mail is sent to Best Buy’s executive leadership and members of their employee LGBT group (PRIDE).

Kevin O'Donovan June 7, 2012 at 02:21 am
It is a Defense of Traditional Marriage, not an assault on homosexuals. Homosexuals have the same rights to marry as anyone else. One man can marry one woman. To legitimize a clinical disorder, and deem it to be commendable is both ignorant and destructive to our society. People engaging in homosexual behavior should not be allowed to adopt children, and deviant sexual behaviors should not be taught in public schools.
This June 7, 2012 at 02:41 am
It;s not BestBuys responsibility to support/oppose gay marriage. It is their job to sell. It is ridiculous to think that somehow BestBuy is "responsible" to stand up for gay marriage or any other political issue. They are a company who's job it is to make make money and not take political sides.
Juniper June 7, 2012 at 03:50 pm
There is no such thing as "traditional" marriage. Marriage has changed in every epoch, and every decade, and is still evolving. In the 60s marriage evolved in the US to allow people to marry regardless of race. Gay people do not choose to be gay. We live in all sectors of society. And the majority of people have no problem with people being gay or in equal marriage.
Charlie Groth June 8, 2012 at 02:42 pm
yes because allowing gay marriage is more detrimental to society than the around 50% divorce rate. Let's get the government out of marriage and solve everyone's problem.
Sean Hayford Oleary June 9, 2012 at 05:53 pm
A "clinical disorder" according to whom, exactly?
Jody Johnson June 10, 2012 at 01:24 am
Being gay is not a clinical disorder, Kevin. It hasn't been considered one since the 1970's, when it was taken out of the DSM (diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders). People are born gay, just like they are born straight. I know a number of same sex families, and one family that has done foster care for years. The people I know have been loving and devoted parents and foster parents. You are coming across as a bigot, and an uninformed one at that. Jody Johnson, M.S.Ed
Sharon Rosenberg-Scholl June 10, 2012 at 07:14 pm
There are so many false statements here.
"It is a Defense of Traditional Marriage, not an assault on homosexuals. Homosexuals have the same rights to marry as anyone else." In fact, same-sex married couples do not threaten opposite-sex married couples, so there is nothing to defend from. Not approving of something or someone does not inherently make it a threat. This idea that some married couples are a threat to other married couples has been bandied around, but both in court and out no instance of this actually occurring has yet to be shown. (continued)
Sharon Rosenberg-Scholl June 10, 2012 at 07:16 pm
"Homosexuals have the same rights to marry as anyone else. One man can marry one woman." Being asked to divorce one's spouse and marry someone else to be treated fairly is not anywhere close to being given "the same rights." I would not expect the writer to do such a preposterous thing in order to receive fair treatment.
(continued)
Sharon Rosenberg-Scholl June 10, 2012 at 07:17 pm
"To legitimize a clinical disorder, and deem it to be commendable is both ignorant and destructive to our society." Homosexuality is not a clinical disorder. The writer seems to only have pre-1974 information.
Sharon Rosenberg-Scholl June 10, 2012 at 07:19 pm
"People engaging in homosexual behavior should not be allowed to adopt children, and deviant sexual behaviors should not be taught in public schools." While the writer is certainly entitled to any opinion, these are not at all supported by any body of research or foothold is reality. Children do very well with same-sex parents and the bigotry and homophobia the writer favors are actually a huge problem in schools right now.
David Haines June 22, 2012 at 02:50 pm
Best Buy (and any company that has employees in Minnesota) has every right to speak out if they feel this amendment will effect their ability to recruit talent. In that case it is a purely economical issue. They could feel it puts them at a competitive disadvantage, and I agree with that.
They could also want equality for their current employees, which I agree with as well. So as you can see, there are two VERY real reasons why Minnesota companies can and should take a stand on this amendment.
Gregory Stanton August 3, 2012 at 07:23 pm
Jody, while not well known, if you have done any research into the 1970's decision to take homosexuality out of the DSM then you'd know that it was done on an almost completely exclusive vote and irrespective of the majority of research done on the subject at the time. There were many psychologists/psychiatrists who disagreed with the decision and whom accused the vote was mostly a political move beginning because of the riot that occured in an APA convention in 1970 by gay activists (Zapping the Shrinks-an article about the event on the rainbowhistory.org site).

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Richfield Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Chris Steller (Editor) June 8, 2013 at 09:21 pm
A shooting death at a house on 16th, according to media reports citing the police.Read More http://richfield.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/reports-richfield-home-site-of-shooting-death - Chris
marlene moore May 31, 2013 at 10:45 am
This is not free! I tried t sign up and was instructed to submit $24.95 for a personal trainer.
Linda Filipiak May 31, 2013 at 03:15 pm
This program was initially offered as a free trial, however the free trial time expired this week.Read More There is now a $24.99 charge to use the program. I am sorry for any inconvenience.
Juniper May 30, 2013 at 12:51 pm
I would love to see Dunn Brother's come back. The parking is the major problem. But I hope theyRead More don't utilize the idea to eliminate lanes on Lyndale. It is already like driving behind a funeral procession - often as slow as 15-20 miles an hour. It is so annoying.
Annie S. June 1, 2013 at 03:28 pm
The
Annie S. June 1, 2013 at 03:29 pm
The fact that the parking lot is hidden makes it appear as though there is little parking, and IRead More think that hurts business there. I think Dunn bros would be awesome but the store is too small for them... The bean roaster would take up 1/2 the store...
Liberaltarian April 19, 2013 at 02:51 am
That's good advice. Also keep in mind that your reactions to the event probably won't be imitatedRead More while your children are young. But as they grow older, they'll subconsciously remember your reactions and that will greatly influence how they respond to these situations in adulthood. So if you're someone who started swearing at the TV about Muslim terrorists, or you wept for the victims, or you prayed for the souls of the perpetrators, you should expect your reaction to ultimately have far more influence on your child than the discussions mentioned in this article.
Diane Baum April 19, 2013 at 05:08 pm
Exactly, Chris Mau!!! Kids live what they learn at home. If we treat kids with respect, as well asRead More how we present the facts of life, kids will grow to become empathetic, meaning, they will care and have compassion for the world around them. If they see us cussing out different races, creeds and colors or origins, they will grow up mean, spiteful and cynical. It's all up to US adults people...who's willing to step to the plate and be that example? These children, they are our future....how they grow depends on us.