patching...
Update: Ways you can help the victims of the Oklahoma tornado. »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Ask a Patch Pro: Pedestrian Safety

What can pedestrians and drivers do to make life safer for people on foot?

 

Walking is such a basic, everyday activity—putting one foot in front of the other—that news of pedestrians dying or suffering severe injuries while they're simply out and about is particularly harrowing.

What steps can pedestrians, motorists, even bicyclists take to reduce the danger to people who simply want or need to walk to get from one place to another in the community? Is there anything local or state government is or should be doing?

Ask your questions in comments below and look for a reply from an expert.

Our Patch Pros for this topic are James Ingham of Northfield Hospital EMS, Anne Marie Buck, the police services liaison at the Hopkins Police Department, Dale Butler of Fridley, who blogs about pedestrian safety at a blog called, appropriately enough, Pedestrian Safety, and Fay Simer with the Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Our panel of experts will check the comments below and try to answer your questions over the course of this Ask a Patch Pro feature on Tuesday, Oct. 23, and Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012. Thanks to all our Patch pros and questioners for participating!

Related Topics: Ask a Patch Pro and Pedestrian Safety

Patch_comments_icon

Kris Janisch

11:38 am on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Folks in Woodbury will want to know about roundabouts and pedestrian safety. Can you talk about the differences between them and intersections?

Reply

lisa taylor

1:02 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

I don't like the roundabouts because know one really respects them or crosswalk.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

James Sanna

1:09 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

How often do you encounter distracted pedestrians who've been hit by cars? Does it really happen as often as some folks claim? (e.g. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2012-07-30/distracted-walking/56588668/1)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Fay Simer, MnDOT

12:24 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

While it’s difficult to secure this sort of data, anecdotally, we see more pedestrians interacting with mobile devices/music devices while they're walking, therefore, there is a greater possibility that they are distracted. As a pedestrian, don't forget that drivers can be distracted too. It's important to be alert and aware while crossing- make sure the driver sees you and will stop.

Comment_arrow

Emily B

2:06 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I recently heard these types of walkers referred to as "Zombie Pedestrians." And yes, it happens a lot. I encounter them all the time, both on foot and on bike.

This blog also comments about walkers/runners not looking just at their phones, but with earbuds in, not being able to hear passing bikes: http://panethos.wordpress.com/2012/09/12/zombie-pedestrian-dodge-em/

With earbuds in and eyes glued to the screen, its like they're walking around blind and deaf, though I'd venture to say they are less aware than someone who is actually blind and deaf because they don't realize they are and somehow believe they are invincible.

Comment_arrow

MJ Rollins

5:29 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I have been walking on the paths in Plymouth twice daily for 17+ years. I don't talk on the phone (unless I'm calling 9-1-1) nor do I listen to music, have ear buds in, etc. My hearing is excellent. I have however, almost been run over on multiple occasions (more in the past summer) by bikes speeding up on us from behind. I understand there are pedestrians that don't pay attention- BUT bikes are pretty silent and when they share a walking path, the riders should at least make an effort to let the walker(s) know they are (fast) approaching. With that said, I too have seen the zombie pedestrians (I stopped a woman in downtown Mpls from walking right in front of a bus) BUT on a path in the burbs, if you bike and share that walking path, be courteous enough to let the walkers know you are there!

Comment_arrow

Emily B

8:32 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

MJ - Agreed! "On your left!" is my constant call on the trail.

Michael Garlitz

1:26 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Can you clarify the law pertaining to pedestrians in marked crosswalks and unmarked crosswalks? I walk a lot, and I struggle with when drivers should be stopping and giving me the right-of-way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Susan

5:17 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Michael, I hope you don't mind but I am going to jump in here. I live in a tourist town that has many pedestrians in the summer. There are dangerous situations almost every busy day downtown because pedestrians incorrectly assume that they always have the right of way. Here is how the current statutes read:

Minnesota Statute 169.21 PEDESTRIAN
169.22. Subd. 2.Rights in absence of signal. (a) Where traffic-control signals are not in place or in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall stop to yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway WITHIN A MARKED CROSSWALK OR AT AN INTERSECTION with no marked crosswalk.

(b) When any vehicle is stopped at a marked crosswalk or at an intersection with no marked crosswalk to permit a pedestrian to cross the roadway, the driver of any other vehicle approaching from the rear SHALL NOT OVERTAKE AND PASS THE STOPPED VEHICLE.

Subd. 3.Crossing between intersections.
(a) Every pedestrian crossing a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or at an intersection with no marked crosswalk SHALL YIELD THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL VEHICLES UPON THE ROADWAY.

(c) Between adjacent intersections at which traffic-control signals are in operation PEDESTRIANS SHALL NOT CROSS AT ANY PLACE EXCEPT IN MARKED CROSSWALK.

Comment_arrow

Dale Butler

8:41 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Check this link for the answer in Minnesota drivers manual. It basically say you must yeald to a pedestrian in a marked, or unmarked crosswalk.
https://dps.mn.gov/divisions/dvs/forms-documents/Documents/Minnesota_Drivers_Manual.pdf

Comment_arrow

Fay Simer, MnDOT

12:14 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

In Minnesota, every corner is a crosswalk. In other words, drivers must stop for crossing pedestrians whether or not there is paint marking the crosswalk. Check out MnDOT's new Share the Road campaign for safety tips both drivers and pedestrians - www.sharetheroadmn.org

Heyitsme

5:00 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Marked crosswalks, pedestrians are to use the signals. Unmarked drivers are supposed to stop. Pedestrians have the right of way on unmarked but really need to use logical and LOOK before stepping out. 3000 lbs of vehicle hitting you because you have the law on your side isn't worth it. Just look and don't assume that they will stop.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

James Sanna

5:42 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

That sounds like my rule when bicycling. I'm a hard-core commuter cyclist who knows every inch of the state statutes and city ordinances laying out my rights...but I don't argue with people wielding deadly weapons.

Comment_arrow

Susan

6:48 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Good for you, James. I had an exchange here with another cyclist who said that he automatically assumes that drivers CANNOT see him. Making eye contact, if possible, is always preferable to just hoping that drivers see and recognize that you have the right of way.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

James Sanna

10:30 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Still, I wish more drivers kept their wits about them and learned the darn traffic laws. I almost got run over by a semi the other day whose driver thought it was ok to turn across a bike lane (A well-marked bike lane! In Minneapolis!) without signaling. </soapbox>

Comment_arrow

Sean Hayford Oleary

11:01 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Curiously, some studies indicate that drivers are *less* likely to yield to pedestrians when you make eye contact. That's a strong indication that drivers' behavior is based more on their sense of being able to get away with something than it is their ability to react to the pedestrian in time. Not to suggest anyone should walk blindly into traffic, but the correlation is really interesting.

Comment_arrow

Heyitsme

12:35 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Exactly James. Pedestrians have the right of way...but they should make sure the vehicles stop for them before stepping out.

Comment_arrow

Heyitsme

12:42 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I was using unmarked as not having crossing signals, sorry. Unmarked means corners or intersections that there is sidewalks/paths and they are not marked with paint. If there is crossing lights/signals, pedestrians are too obey those lights. I have almost hit pedestrians because they are standing on the corner and they just step out without waiting on the signal and I am driving into the sunrise.

Dale Butler

8:46 pm on Tuesday, October 23, 2012

I ride a motorcycle and I automatically assume the auto drivers do not see. I also assume that one of them is going to do something stupid even if he does see me.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Chris Steller

1:46 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I saw a crosswalk in the parking lot of Byerly's grocery store in Roseville that was marked with one of those plastic post that says State Law Stop for Pedestrians. Maybe it's a technicality, but does state law about crosswalks apply to private parking lots?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carbon Bigfuut

10:12 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

State law does not apply to stop signs on private property, so I would presume that it doesn't apply to crosswalks, either.

David F

8:34 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Enforcement, enforcement, enforcement. California has the same pedestrian crosswalk laws but they have been strictly enforced for decades and people know violating the laws will get you an expensive ticket and police are not hesitant to enforce the law. In Washington, DC police will give you a ticket if you enter a crosswalk at a stop light. MN needs tighter enforcement of the laws on the books regarding pedestrian safety and better education of young drivers. I run in urban areas of the Twin Cities and I routinely have to wait for cars to go by before I can cross at a marked or unmarked intersection, nobody stops. I don't know how may years or deaths it will take but all cell phone/smart devices should be banned while driving i.e. inattentive driving.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SomeGuy

9:39 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

In Seattle, you will get cited for jaywalking. Why? Because that is the law and it is ENFORCED!

Enforcement leads to consistent driver, cyclist and pedestrian behavior which leads to fewer injuries and deaths and to more efficient traffic for all types of transportation (which is vital in the Twin Cities and suburbs, given the incredibly inept roadway engineering and design).

Comment_arrow

Elle

2:31 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I agree that enforcement is needed, and add that ongoing education is a good idea too. We live near Mound and while I have been impressed with our local police department's vigilant efforts to enforce pedestrian crosswalk laws, it is an inherently dangerous situation. Police presence does have an impact, but this is clearly a topic that warrants more attention due to the potentially deadly mix of humans and vehicles. Also, what is the law for pedestrians in crosswalks at night? There are a couple ridiculous ped crosswalks on the twisting, 2 lane Cty Rd 15 that runs along Lake Minnetonka. With the speed limit at 40-45, this makes stopping during the day hazardous enough. Are drivers really expected to be able to see/stop for pedestrians on unlit roads at night? When I travel as a pedestrian, I ALWAYS assume my safety is my responsibility.

Mary Jo

9:05 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I have a real issue with the pedestrian law. I don't disagree with stopping for pedestrians but I don't always feel safe stopping in the middle of a busy street when I'm not confident the driver behind me will see me and stop in time. I see a lot of pedestrians who wave me on when I attempt to stop for them, so I can only assume they don't feel comfortable with it, either. I'd much rather risk a ticket than risk having someone hit me from behind, causing me to run over a walker. I asked a state patrol officer about this one time and his response was that the driver behind me was responsible for stopping - faint comfort if I end up with body damage, or worse yet, if the pedestrian does.

Reply

Emily B

9:07 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Since others have brought up crosswalks, I want someone to please explain to me the Right of Way (RoW) at Wooddale and the Cedar Lake Trail in SLP.
Here we have an awful 5 way intersection of cars, bikes and walkers. Two directions of driving (N and S Wooddale) have no stop signs at all. Trail users have stop signs BUT also a cross walk painted on the road. Drivers off of eastbound Hwy 7 have a stop sign, but are generally making a R-hand turn, so I can never figure out if they have the RoW over a cyclist from either direction going straight to continue on the trail. Also, there are N and S bound bike lanes on Wooddale,
So, do ALL cars have to stop for ALL trail users or just pedestrians? Bikes need to follow driving laws, but how does that work when you're not on a regular street and come to a crossing with a street? What if I walk my bike? My understanding is that once a person or bike occupies the cross walk, all drivers must stop, but how do I know when I can start crossing if I'm not sure who has the RoW in the first place? Plus, this is the widest darn intersection, so even if I start crossing when it is clear of cars, a car has usually appears by the time you get to the other lane.
This is the worst intersection in SLP (Beltline isn't far behind), in my opinion, mostly because there has been very little education about RoW and it is a very busy intersection.
Thanks for guidance. Would love to see some folks out next spring educating users at this location.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cassandra

10:32 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

A trail crossing is different from a crosswalk - KSTP higlighted this in a news story a few weeks ago, and pictured the trail crossing in Hopkins at Blake Rd (by Pizza Luce). The law states (sorry, I don't know where) that drivers do not have to stop for cyclists/pedestrians who are waiting at a trail crossing - cars always have the right of way, and others have to wait for the way to be clear. Although, in practice, most drivers assume they are supposed to stop for someone waiting to cross, which can be frustrating for trail users who then have to wait for ALL lanes of traffic to stop.

I think this applies to your trail crossing at Wooddale as well. Once you are in the intersection, I would assume you have the right-of-way ahead of drivers that appear before you reach the other side (you obviously shouldn't stop before you get all the way acrosss).

Comment_arrow

Sean Hayford Oleary

10:49 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Actually, Cassandra isn't quite right here. The answer is that it depends on the particular trail crossing. A (public) trail is considered a "highway", and pedestrians have right-of-way at any intersections of two highways, no matter what (unless it's signalized, in which case they must follow the signals). At Wooddale, I believe the crosswalk is also marked. ANY location with crosswalk markings on the surface of the pavement is a crosswalk. This means that pedestrians have right-of-way, but it also means bicyclists have right-of-way.

So to be clear: cyclists have right-of-way only when riding in a marked crosswalk. Pedestrians have right-of-way at all unsignalized intersections. If there is a stop sign prior to the crosswalk, however, the cyclists should stop and cross at a reasonable pedestrian speed.

And if you walk your bike, you're a pedestrian in the eyes of the law, regardless.

Adrienne Ludwig

9:13 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

As a recent transplant from Illinois, I am AMAZED at all the pedestrians who just walked out without bothering to check traffic. In an interaction between car vs pedestrian, it is the pedestrian that will lose on impact. This is especially upsetting while trying to navagiate in shopping centers were young children who are not being taught to be careful because parents EXPECT the driver to be paying attention while they are not. Despite what the laws in each state, it is common sense is to look both ways, wait until the driver stops (or is aware of their intention) before entering the path.

Reply

Sara Maaske

10:04 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

In Bloomington, Edina and Richfield, we're encouraging residents to take their streets into their own hands and "do" a walking audit to a local destination. It’s an easy way to give feedback to your city as they plan for street and sidewalk improvements. Email do.town at info@do-town.org if you would like to join in!

Reply

Sean Hayford Oleary

10:50 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I agree with previous posters about the roundabouts. While I think they manage traffic well, it is difficult to get cars to yield at the crosswalks (especially cars exiting the roundabout). Of the two in Richfield, the Richfield Pkwy/66th seems to be the worst. I'm not sure if the Portland one is better because of proximity to the police station, or if people are just anxious to get to the Cedar Ave freeway at the Richfield Pkwy roundabout.

Reply

Thomas

11:45 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I don't want on my tombstone "He Had The Rightaway" I keep my eyes open and do not assume the driver of a vehicle will take care for me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean Hayford Oleary

1:01 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

That's a fair point Thomas, but let's remember that "might does not make right" either. I think the healthiest balance for pedestrians is probably the same way a passenger car treats semis: be a bit cautious, but don't automatically surrender right-of-way. Say you're driving along and see a semi on a cross street. It has a red light, and you have a green. Do you stop completely on the green and make sure the semi isn't going to go -- since you would lose in a battle? No, of course not. But let's say the semi does run the light, or makes an improper right turn on red -- you're prepared, and you slow down as needed. Similarly, pedestrians should act with the presumption that others will respect their ROW, but be prepared to react if they don't.

Comment_arrow

Thomas

3:45 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I belive that is what I just said. BTW.. I have driven Semi for a time and It is clear to me most "4 wheelers" know to give you some room .. it is in their best interest. The worst thing that could happen is to run over one.

Betsy Gasior

11:54 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

What really drives me nuts are gaggles of walkers, runners or bicyclists that take up the entire half of the road causing me to creep along behind them when it's not safe to pass. Walkers can use the the sidewalk. So can runners, but I get that asphalt is more giving than cement. Most places have laws against riding bikes along the sidewalk (and if you're riding instead of pleasure riding, sidewalks aren't conducive to what you want to do anyway). But if you're going to be on the street on your feet, you need to 1) walk/run the direction facing traffic and 2) move over in a single file when you see a vehicle coming. Somes streets are very narrow when they are parked on both sides with cars, and full of vehicle traffic. Your gaggle isn't helping.

I also have a problem with bicyclists not obeying traffic signs. If you're on the road, you're considered another vehicle. You must stop, yield and signal just like a motorized vehicle. I don't care if it "ruins my momentum"...it will *really* ruin your momentum when I've stopped, looked, and proceeded into the intersection (and I've seen you coming and assumed you know the rules and will stop...you're not right at the stop sign ignoring it yet) and you hit my vehicle and flip right over it.

I'm very glad you're riding your bike. It's great. Stay safe so you can keep riding it. Oh, and wear a brain bucket.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James W Ingham

12:57 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Betsy, I am glad to your comment on the "Brain Bucket". In my career, I often see bicycle accidents. One in particular is a young rider who was crossing the roadway and struck by a car. The helmet that this rider was wearing, took the brunt of force and DID prevent a brain injury. The young person credits the helmet. Please, All riders, wear a helmet.

Betsy Gasior

11:59 am on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Also, walkers and bikers, please wear light-colored, reflective clothing at night and in the morning when it's dark out. Our town doesn't have very many or very bright street lights...your black outfit is really hard to see. Also, if you're biking, you must have a headlight and reflectors on your bike in the dark.

Finally, with all of that being said, I'm not a "hater" of walkers/runners/bikers. I just want them to be safe. Those folks can't figure they own the road and the people driving loaded weapons will stop completely and let them go by. On the other hand, the people driving those loaded weapons need to realize that they *are* driving a loaded weapon and use it accordingly. Take the extra time to watch for walkers/bikers/bikers, give them a wide berth when you can, and we can all get to where we're going safely.

*steps down from soapbox*

Reply

Ann

12:06 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

You may enjoy this one. A couple years back when my children were younger I was walking with them to a local playground. We had to cross a road with a marked crosswalk. Several cars passed by without stopping and I noticed a marked squad car approaching, and he was not slowing down either. I made eye contact with the officer and gave him the "Mom" look. He immediately put his lights on, backed up and informed me he "was not required to stop at the crosswalk because we were waiting on the sidewalk and that he was only required to stop if I was actually in the crosswalk." This both surprised and infuriated me because he expected me to actually have myself and 3 children in the crosswalk hoping that speeding cars would stop. So according to law enforcement....walk out into the crosswalk, don't check your safety and the law with protect you from being hit by a passing motorist...good grief!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean Hayford Oleary

12:55 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Technically, he's right: the law doesn't explicitly require you to stop for pedestrians near a crosswalk, only those in one. But of course, if they're obviously waiting to cross, it's in pretty bad faith to ignore them and say they weren't in the crosswalk yet. My suggestion: as long as the road isn't super-narrow, set one foot onto the street surface. You are in the crosswalk at that point. Make sure a car is not approaching "so close so that it would be impossible for the drier to yield, and then go." IMHO, state law should be revised to say that you are in a crosswalk if you are within a foot or two of the street surface's crosswalk.

Comment_arrow

Elle

1:48 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

That kind of behavior from anyone is truly offensive, but especially from an officer that has sworn to "serve and protect!" Coincidentally, just yesterday my daughter mentioned that her AAA guide said that most pedestrian accidents happen with their 1st step off the curb! She is studying for her driver's permit and I'm impressed with how seriously she is taking the privilege and responsibility of driving. My first vehicle was a motorcycle, and while I don't advise her to follow in my footsteps, it did train me to drive with the mindset of assuming other drivers do not see you. I also agree with Dale and drive prepared for the possibility of other drivers doing something stupid.

Comment_arrow

Dale Butler

2:08 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Ann, you don't actually have to be in the crosswalk, just one foot into the crosswalk is enough. The officer was right. I always stop on the corner close to the crosswalk entrance and wait for cars to clear. Sometimes cars stop for me and motion me to cross in front of them. although that car may be stopped others may not see me and continue around that car. I refuse and remain out of the crosswalk until I am sure drivers are able to see me and HAVE TIME TO STOP, Right turn lane cars are the most dangerous when a pedestrian is entering the cross walk. Right turners are usually looking to their left to make sure they are not entering the destination street in front of another car. The pedestrian to their right is almost invisible.

Patch_comments_icon

Chris Steller

12:36 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Pet peeve/mild obsession of mine: T-intersections. They're rarely marked with crosswalks, but if there's a stop sign or traffic signal, it's considered a controlled intersection and a legal crosswalk. But that's where pedestrians need marked crossings the most, because there are fewer visual cues to drivers that one street is meeting another there. Does any city or location handle T-insections well?

Reply

J

1:35 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I'm sorry, but I don't give a damn what the law says about stopping for peds in crosswalks. I am not stopping, it is far safer for me to keep moving along the road rather than slamming on the brakes for a ped that can wait for a clear spot or wait for the ped light. I'll take the ticket, but common sense says to not slam on the brakes unexpectedly. I work with a guy who did stop for a biker at a crossing on a county road, got rear-ended and broke his neck, that was many years ago, he still hasn't recovered. Sorry peds, stand there and wait.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dale Butler

2:10 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

If the pedertrian is walking against the light, then he is in the wrong. That still does not give you the right to kill him when you could have stopped.

Comment_arrow

Joshua

3:19 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

That's funny because I feel the same way about red lights and stop signs. Forget the law!

Maybe if you were paying attention to the road you wouldn't have to "slam" on your brakes and get rear-ended to stop for a pedestrian.

Comment_arrow

Emily B

3:20 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

J, I understand the concern here, but I wonder if people consider that many of us do stand there for a LONG time waiting. I used to live on Minnetonka Blvd, near the Mpls border. I had a crosswalk at my building, with a big florescent yellow PED sign by it, which I used to get to the bus in the morning. I always tried to go out early enough so I could wait if traffic was bad, but some times cars just would not stop. During rush times, Minnetonka is very busy and you could be waiting there a long time. Some times if I was in a hurry, I would take my chances, if I saw a car coming far enough back (usually half a block), I would step out, put my hand up, wave it to make sure they saw me and walk across quickly. This worked well for me, but I think there are many people who would just end up standing there forever and there aren't lights to safely cross at on Minnetonka between France and Ottawa, so you have to use the crosswalks.

James W Ingham

3:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

No one really wants to see any body get hurt. I am sure that No one wnats to be the person responsible for killing someone. Please, walking, driving or riding bikes, pay attention to your surroundings. Please obey the laws, be responsible and most importantly, keep you and others around you safe. Afterall, none of you really want to meet me on the street.

Reply

Dale Butler

3:44 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Why would I not want to meet you on the street? Are you more dangerous than traffic?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James W Ingham

6:23 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I am a Paramedic. LOL Not good when I show up...

Emily B

5:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Ultimately, reading all these comments reminds me why I don't often drive. I prefer letting a bus driver have the responsibility, since it is their JOB to drive safely and responsibly. I realize, they're not all perfect, but they keep me safe and help me not have to be the stressed out driver watching for all sorts of other people's distractions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heyitsme

10:34 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Must be nice to live in a town where you have the convenience of bus service, not all communities have the same.

rob_h78

5:25 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Regarding stopping for walkers. While I stop for walkers when feasible when I see them at crosswalks honestly it can be a frightening experience.

I find very few drivers watch for people standing at crosswalks that aren't metered in some way and if there is someone right behind me there is no way I'll try to stop at the crosswalk unless the person is literally in the crosswalk because I have no confidence at all that the guy tailgating me wont' slam into me...

Also, the other day I stopped at a crosswalk on a street that is right next to an elementary school - and this was at 8:50am while people were walking to school and the guy behind me, instead of stopping, just zoomed around me and flew through the crosswalk and he would have taken out the two kids walking had the timing just been a few seconds later.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MJ Rollins

5:38 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

This same scenario has happened so frequently to my husband and I, that our rule now is that all cars must be at a complete stop in both directions before we will cross. Scary!!

Comment_arrow

Susan

8:12 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I'm sure this may be wrong, but when I now stop for walkers at a crosswalk and I see them far enough ahead, I position my vehicle in the middle/to-the-right of my lane so no one mistakes me for waiting to turn left, and tries to pass me on the right...there is simply no room for them to get by on the right if I have my car in the right position.

It will frustrate the driver behind me, but once they see the pedestrians, they are quickly humbled and understand.

MJ Rollins

5:36 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

On our busy street, Schmidt Lake Road in Plymouth, it would be nice to have the crosswalk signs that flash (walker pushes the button and the lights flash on top of the pedestrian signs)... might not "make" people stop, but at least it would get more of their attention. I also recommend highly reflective gear for our dark mornings and evenings AND a really good flashlight... but that still doesn't guarantee they will 1) see you or 2) stop.

Reply

Dale Butler

6:23 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

My apologiea to James for the above comment. I thought he was a policeman and I have heard similar rheroric from some policemen before.

Reply
Comment_arrow

James W Ingham

4:02 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

No worries Dale, I often get called a cop by my Patients. LOL

James W Ingham

6:30 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Hi Vis is a great way help you be seen, but don't trust that you are seen. Reading the posts here, I can tell that most of the people here are safety concious. Simple rules remain, Make eye contact with the drivers, walkers or riders when ever possible. Wear protective and visible gear and clothing, slow down when pedestrians are around and never count on the other person seeing you.

Reply

Dale Butler

6:31 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

The 4 comments above make my case for better enforcement. As more ane more cars crowd our roads and people are becoming more rushed by the day, the problem is going to get even worse. If we don't step up enforcement in a big way more and more peds. and motorists are going to be killed.

Reply

Dale Butler

8:48 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

To all those who worry about the person behind hitting them if they try to stop for a ped. Ask yourself, If I found myself suddenly on a collision course with a deer, a truck, or a train; would I worry about the driver behind me who is charged with keeping his vehicle under control? I think the answer will clearly be no. So think of colliding with a human as a train wreck and apply the brakes.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Chris Steller

10:50 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Dale, interesting way to put it. I stopped for a pedestrian in St. Paul where they enforce the crosswalk law more so than other places. It was an odd intersection where the cross street zig zagged, meeting the bigger street I was driving on at two different places. Anyway, there was a pedestrian waiting to cross. I stopped. The car behind me stopped. But the third car back hit the car behind me. I stuck around and told the cop about my role in what happened. He said, you did the right thing, you don't have to stay. I still felt a little guilty but the way you put it I don't feel so bad.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Susan

8:54 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Chris, in a rear-end collision, I am pretty sure it is always the fault of the driver in back. They are following too close, not paying close enough attention, or traveling too fast for conditions. Of-course this does not make it any better for the person getting hit and/or hurt, but it is the tail-gater who is to blame, not the person stopping. CB, if you are still monitoring, could you (or anyone else in the know) confirm?

Nick

11:44 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Just my two cents, I only stop for pedestrians if they are either handicapped, elderly, or if it is raining or snowing out. I normally won't stop because I have had too many close calls with getting rear-ended or people zooming around me and almost hitting the person I stopped for.

I don't think it is wise to encourage people to walk in front of vehicles. It is too dangerous, and what does anyone gain by trying it? A few minutes time if you are the ped? Is that worth putting your life in the hands of someone who is probably texting and speeding? No. There is a lot being put at risk for little to no gain. It is not wise. Peds should wait for the cars to pass, then cross. Right or wrong, it is the best way to ensure the safety of everyone.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sean Hayford Oleary

6:22 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

The rear-ending thing is a bit strange to me. Here in Richfield, our major streets have 35 mph speed zones and no turn lanes -- so if you're turning left, you likely have to make a complete stop in a traffic lane. If you're turning right, you need to slow to 5-10 mph. While I'm sure accidents happen in these contexts, too, nobody seems so terrified of getting rear-ended that they don't turn off these streets as a matter of course. If you have adequate time to react to the pedestrian, how is this any different?

Comment_arrow

Dale Butler

9:05 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I agree with MR. Oleary, I also think if you are so worried about the car behind you are spending too much time with your eye glued to the rear view mirror. If that is the case you need to move out of the way and allow that car to pass. distracted driving by constantly monitoring the rearview mirror is just as bad as any other type of distracted driving with the possible exception of texting, which we all know is the most dangerous.

Heyitsme

12:17 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Then you are in violation of the law. The law needs more enforcement which will help with training drivers NOT to ignore it. Other states have adopted it and within a few short months the drivers GET it.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Chris Steller

1:12 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Folks, officially this Ask a Patch Pro Q&A session ended on Wednesday, Oct. 24, 2012. However, the comments will stay open for anyone, Patch Pros and commenters, to keep the discussion going. Many thanks to everyone who has participated, Pros and commenters alike.

Reply

PedalPower

2:09 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Roundabouts= urban planning fad. Dangerous for pedestrians,cyclists and motorists.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy Marsh

3:25 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Funny how Great Britain and Europe have survived such an urban planning fad for so long. You should really try to get out more, grasshopper.

Comment_arrow

Sean Hayford Oleary

6:19 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

They really aren't dangerous for cars -- it's almost universally accepted that they reduce fatal accidents by about 90%. I have mixed feelings on how beneficial they are to pedestrians and cyclists, however. They probably still reduce *fatal* accidents, since cars are physically forced to slow down, and it's rare for a pedestrian to die if the vehicle is going <20 mph on impact. But they may increase non-fatal accidents, and at the very least are more distressing for most than a walk signal.

guigui

2:59 am on Monday, October 29, 2012

The big storm taking aim at the http://www.coachoutletonlineoe.com/ Coach Factory Outlet East Coast a little more than a week before the election has scrambled campaign plans, with both http://www.louisvuittonbeltspc.com/ Louis Vuitton Belts candidates canceling events and President Barack Obama moving up his departure for Florida to beat the storm.In an http://www.coachoutletsstorebm.com/ Coach Factory Outlet extraordinarily tight race, Hurricane Sandy has forced Obama and Republican Mitt Romney to toss out http://www.guccibeltsmh.com/ Gucci Belts carefully mapped-out itineraries as the candidates work to maximize voter turnout while avoiding any suggestion they were http://www.coachouletbtf.com/ Coach Factory Outlet putting politics ahead of public safety. Romney canceled plans to campaign in Virginia on Sunday, opting instead to http://www.coachoutletuse.net/ Coach Factory Outlet join running mate Paul Ryan in Ohio.On Saturday, Romney was in Florida speaking of bipartisanship, while Obama http://www.coachoutletb1.com/ Coach Factory Online tried to nail down New Hampshire’s four electoral votes.The former Massachusetts governor presented himself http://www.coachoutlethcs.com/ Coach Outlet Online as a staunch conservative during the Republican primaries but has struck a more moderate tone as he appeals http://www.coachoutletonlinetpc.net/ Coach Outlet Online

Reply

Leave a comment